Download metadata

Managing for Development Results (MfDR) Indicators database: 2013

By Innovation in Citizen Services Division (VPS/IFD/ICS)

This database delivers information about several management systems, classified in five “pillars” of the public sector management cycle that are considered important for the implementation of Management for Development Results (MfDR): (i) results-based planning, (ii) results-based budgeting, (iii) public financial management (including auditing and procurement), (iv) program and project management (including the public investment system), and (v) monitoring and evaluation of public management. These pillars are broken down into components that track the maturity of institutional systems. The components are in turn composed of indicators and minimum requirements that these systems must have in an MfDR environment. The most of these requirements are categorized alternatively as: the requirement is met, partially met, or is not met.

Show more

Metadata & use

Identifier https://doi.org/10.60966/mzrsx0dw
License Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivs 3.0 IGO
Citation

Kaufmann, Jorge;García Moreno, Mauricio, 2015, Managing for Development Results (MfDR) Indicators database: 2013, IDB Open Data, https://doi.org/10.60966/mzrsx0dw
Issued date 2015-12-29
Modified date 2025-04-11
Tags/Keywords Monitoring And Evaluation · Planning · Program And Project Management · Public Financial Management · Public Sector · RBDM · Results-Based Budgeting · Results-Based Development Management
Language Spanish
Temporal coverage 2013-2013
Geographic coverage
Argentina
Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
El Salvador
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Suriname
Trinidad and Tobago
Regional coverage Latin America and the Caribbean
Publisher
Inter-American Development Bank
Author
Kaufmann, Jorge
García Moreno, Mauricio
Inter-American Development Bank
Data collection type Survey Data
Statistical type Cross-sectional Data
Data structure Structured Data
Data notes

The methodology of this database is based on the PET questionnaire on MfDR, containing a greater amount of information and offering a more didactic method to check the compliance with the conditions for an effective MfDR. Thus, the structure of this questionnaire, forming the database, is based on the concept that there are five intervening elements in the process of public value creation, namely: 1) results-based planning, 2) results-based budgeting, 3) financial management, audit, and procurement, 4) program and project management, and, 5) monitoring and evaluation. These elements, called pillars of the management cycle, are broken down in a set of components that describe the maturity of the institutional systems. In turn, the components consist of indicators and requirements that these institutions, systems and processes should have in an MfDR environment. The questionnaire includes four kinds of requirements: those that measure compliance of a condition, those that indicate a percentage, the special cases, and those that request additional information. (1) Requirements that measure compliance are the predominant type of requirements in this questionnaire. The requirements that measure compliance specify the situation that must occur in order to be considered fully or partially compliant. However, some of these types of requirements do not include partial compliance, only fully compliance and non-compliance. (2) Requirements that measure percentages specify the calculation that should be performed. (3) This questionnaire includes three requirements considered special cases because they are neither part of those that measure compliance, nor of those that measure percentages. All these cases are tha calculation of number of average days. (4) Finally, there are a very restricted number of requirements in which is asked to provide additional information. For example, the number of persons who work in an entity or unit.

Dataset files

Load more