Kaufmann, Jorge, et al. (2015). Managing for Development Results (MfDR) Indicators database: 2013. IDB Open Data. https://doi.org/10.60966/mzrsx0dw

1. Spanish

What is the Managing for Development Results (MfDR) Indicators Database?

The Managing for Development Results (MfDR) Indicators Database is a regional dataset developed by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) to assess the performance and maturity of public-sector management systems across Latin America and the Caribbean.
It evaluates how well countries integrate results-oriented practices in planning, budgeting, financial management, and monitoring public programs.

What does “Managing for Development Results” mean?

Managing for Development Results (MfDR) is a management strategy focused on achieving measurable development outcomes through evidence-based planning, budgeting, implementation, and evaluation.
The approach strengthens accountability, efficiency, and transparency across public institutions.

How are countries evaluated in the MfDR database?

Countries are evaluated based on whether each institutional requirement is:

• Met — The system is fully implemented.
• Partially Met — Implementation exists but needs improvement.
• Not Met — The system or practice is missing.

This structure provides a standardized, comparable snapshot of public management capacity across countries.

What information does the database contain?

The dataset includes:

• Indicators that measure progress toward results-based management
• Country-level classifications across five management pillars
• Institutional maturity assessments for core public administration systems
• Comparative results for tracking reform progress across countries and over time

What countries are covered?

The MfDR database covers Latin American and Caribbean countries that are borrowing members of the IDB.
These include:
Argentina, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, and Venezuela.

How often is the MfDR database updated?

Updates depend on the availability of new evaluations and country inputs.
The dataset is periodically reviewed and enhanced to reflect institutional reforms and methodological updates from the IDB.

How can this dataset be used?

Researchers, policymakers, and development practitioners can use the MfDR Indicators Database to:

• Benchmark public sector management performance
• Identify institutional strengths and weaknesses
• Support policy reforms and capacity-building initiatives
• Evaluate progress toward results-based public management

What is the definition of managing for development results?

Managing for Development Results (MfDR) is a public-sector management approach that emphasizes measurable outcomes rather than inputs or activities. The dataset defines MfDR through five pillars: results-based planning, results-based budgeting, financial management (including audit and procurement), program and project management, and monitoring and evaluation.

What are the 5 core principles of managing for development results?

The database identifies five pillars of MfDR: 1. Results-based planning
2. Results-based budgeting
3. Public financial management (audit and procurement)
4. Program and project management (including public investment systems)
5. Monitoring and evaluation of public management

These pillars are broken down into components, indicators, and requirements to assess institutional maturity.

How to implement a results-based monitoring and evaluation system?

The dataset highlights monitoring and evaluation as one of the five pillars. Implementation involves setting indicators, defining compliance requirements, and tracking whether conditions are fully met, partially met, or unmet. It also includes requirements for percentages and special cases (e.g., average days to complete processes).

What are the common challenges in implementing MfDR in developing countries?

The dataset notes that requirements are often categorized as met, partially met, or unmet. This highlights challenges in institutional maturity, compliance, and data availability. Special cases (such as calculating average days) highlight difficulties in standardizing measures across countries.

What are the key indicators for measuring development results?

Indicators in the MfDR database include compliance measures (whether a condition is met), percentage-based measures, and special cases (e.g., average days to complete processes). These indicators track institutional maturity across the five pillars.

How does Managing for Development Results (MfDR) differ from traditional input-based management in the public sector?

MfDR emphasizes outcomes and institutional maturity, whereas traditional input-based management focuses on resource expenditures. The dataset tracks compliance with results-based systems, not just financial inputs.

What are the common organizational barriers to shifting from an activity-based culture to a results-oriented culture?

The dataset indicates barriers due to unmet or partially met requirements, revealing gaps in institutional maturity across planning, budgeting, and monitoring systems.

How can government finance ministers use MfDR to improve national budget transparency and performance-based budgeting?

The dataset highlights results-based budgeting as a pillar, showing how governments can align budgets with outcomes rather than inputs.

What are the characteristics of a 'Results-Based Culture' in a public institution?

The dataset implies characteristics such as compliance with results-based planning, budgeting, and monitoring requirements, and institutional maturity across the five pillars.

What is the main objective of the 'Managing for Development Results' approach for a general audience?

MfDR aims to strengthen institutional systems by focusing on outcomes rather than inputs. It uses five pillars—planning, budgeting, financial management, program management, and monitoring/evaluation—to assess maturity and compliance.

What is managing for development results (MfDR) and why is it important in international development?

MfDR is important because it shifts focus from inputs to measurable outcomes, ensuring accountability and institutional maturity in public management systems.