Data associated with: Advanced Experiences in Cybersecurity Policies and Practices: An Overview of Estonia, Israel, South Korea, and the United States
Metadados e uso
| Identificador | https://doi.org/10.60966/gmbqi6gu |
|---|---|
| Licença | Creative Commons Atribuição–NãoComercial–SemDerivações 3.0 IGO |
| Produto de Conhecimento Relacionado | |
| Citação |
Lewis, James Andrew, 2016, Data associated with: Advanced Experiences in Cybersecurity Policies and Practices: An Overview of Estonia, Israel, South Korea, and the United States, IDB Open Data, https://doi.org/10.60966/gmbqi6gu |
| Data de publicação | 2016-01-08 |
| Data de modificação | 2025-12-24 |
| Tags/Palavras-Chave | Caribe · Defesa cibernética · Estratégia cibernética · Cibercrime · Cibersegurança · Redundância digital · Governo eletrônico · Resposta a incidentes · Israel · América Latina · Marcos legais · Infraestrutura crítica nacional · Confiança online · Privacidade · República da Coreia · Resiliência · Coreia do Sul · Estados Unidos |
| Idioma | Spanish |
| Cobertura Temporal | 2015-2015 |
| País |
Estonia
Israel
South Korea
United States
|
| Região | América Latina e Caribe |
| Publicador |
Inter-American Development Bank
|
| Autor |
Lewis, James Andrew
Inter-American Development Bank
|
| Tipo de Coleta de Dados | Dados Observacionais |
| Tipo Estatístico | Cross-sectional Data |
| Estrutura dos Dados | Structured Data |
| Notas dos Dados |
The data was analyzed using the 49 CMM indicators which are divided into five dimensions: i) National Cybersecurity Policy and Strategy (Policy and Strategy); ii) Cyber Culture and Society (Culture and Society); iii) Cybersecurity Education, Training and Skills (Education); iv)Legal and Regulatory Frameworks (Legal Frameworks); and v) Standards, Organizations and Technologies (Technologies). Each dimension has multiple factors which contribute towards a more mature state of cybersecurity capacity. Each factor then has several levels of indicators that describe a state of maturity (Startup, Formative, Established, Strategic and Dynamic). The different levels of maturity listed prompt the researchers to select the level that is most applicable to the experience of cybersecurity in the country based on a thorough policy analysis. For more details please review the “Introduction” section included in the Discussion Paper. |