2016 Cybersecurity Report Data Set

Por Innovation in Citizen Services Division (VPS/IFD/ICS)

Cybersecurity Dataset: Are We Ready in Latin America and the Caribbean? (2016)

This dataset supports the 2016 Cybersecurity Report, Are We Ready in Latin America and the Caribbean?, produced by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), Organization of American States (OAS), and Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre (GCSCC) at Oxford.

Data were collected via an online survey using the Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Model (CMM), developed by the GCSCC. The survey was translated into English and Spanish. Following a pilot phase, it was administered to a diverse group of national stakeholders across 32 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.

The responses were aggregated, reviewed, cleaned, and supplemented with additional information from external sources to ensure completeness and accuracy.

Mostrar mais

Metadados e uso

Identificador https://doi.org/10.60966/ths5uudn
Licença Creative Commons Atribuição–NãoComercial–SemDerivações 3.0 IGO
Produto de Conhecimento Relacionado
Citação

Inter-American Development Bank;Organization of American States, 2015, 2016 Cybersecurity Report Data Set, IDB Open Data, https://doi.org/10.60966/ths5uudn

Data de publicação 2015-12-14
Data de modificação 2025-10-07
Idioma English
Cobertura Temporal 2015-2015
País
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Bahamas
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Saint Lucia
St Kitts and Nevis
St Vincent and Grenadines
Suriname
Trinidad and Tobago
Barbados
Uruguay
Venezuela
Belize
Bolivia
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Região América Latina e Caribe
Publicador
Autor
Tipo de Coleta de Dados Dados de Inquéritos
Tipo Estatístico Panel Data
Estrutura dos Dados Structured Data
Notas dos Dados

The data was analyzed using the 49 CMM indicators which are divided into five dimensions: i) National Cybersecurity Policy and Strategy (Policy and Strategy); ii) Cyber Culture and Society (Culture and Society); iii) Cybersecurity Education, Training and Skills (Education); iv) Legal and Regulatory Frameworks (Legal Frameworks); and v) Standards, Organizations and Technologies (Technologies). Each dimension has multiple factors which contribute towards a more mature state of cybersecurity capacity. Each factor then has several levels of indicators that describe a state of maturity (Startup, Formative, Established, Strategic and Dynamic). The different levels of maturity listed prompt the respondent to select the level that is most applicable to the experience of cybersecurity in the country. The results of the analysis were then sent to each country for validation. For more details please review the “Appendix: Detailed Methodological Framework” included in the 2016 Cybersecurity Report.

Arquivos do conjunto de dados

Carregar mais