{"help": "https://data.iadb.org/pt-BR/api/3/action/help_show?name=package_show", "success": true, "result": {"alternate_identifier": "https://mydata.iadb.org/", "citation": {"en": "Cort\u00e1zar Velarde, Juan Carlos;Lafuente, Mariano;Sangin\u00e9s, Mario, 2015, Civil Service Development Index: 2004-2013, IDB Open Data, https://doi.org/10.60966/im02hm06", "es": "Cort\u00e1zar Velarde, Juan Carlos;Lafuente, Mariano;Sangin\u00e9s, Mario, 2015, Civil Service Development Index: 2004-2013, IDB Open Data, https://doi.org/10.60966/im02hm06", "fr": "Cort\u00e1zar Velarde, Juan Carlos;Lafuente, Mariano;Sangin\u00e9s, Mario, 2015, Civil Service Development Index: 2004-2013, IDB Open Data, https://doi.org/10.60966/im02hm06", "pt_BR": "Cort\u00e1zar Velarde, Juan Carlos;Lafuente, Mariano;Sangin\u00e9s, Mario, 2015, Civil Service Development Index: 2004-2013, IDB Open Data, https://doi.org/10.60966/im02hm06"}, "ckan_dataset_type": "dataset", "conforms_to": "https://data.iadb.org/DataCatalog/v1.0/schema", "creator_user_id": "4ce47dd3-eafd-475e-ac63-0311588ac609", "data_structure": [{"uri": "https://taxonomy.iadb.org/knowledgeProductsTaxonomy/20ec2046-8126-4e1d-a7ec-08a8d3d5f24c", "labels": {"en": "Structured Data", "es": "Datos Estructurados", "fr": "Donn\u00e9es Structur\u00e9es", "pt_BR": "Dados Estruturados"}}], "dataset_id": "79", "frequency": {}, "id": "c4c320d8-63c4-4b6f-a68b-cc462d1edda0", "identifier": "https://doi.org/10.60966/im02hm06", "in_series": {}, "language": ["es"], "license_id": "cc-by-nc-nd", "license_title": "Creative Commons Attribution\u2013NonCommercial\u2013NoDerivs 3.0 IGO", "license_url": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/", "metadata_created": "2015-04-20T00:00:00", "metadata_modified": "2025-12-24T07:16:16.035403", "name": "civil-service-development-index-2004-2013", "num_resources": 1, "num_tags": 0, "organization": {"id": "aa9ea49a-64f0-4dcc-9c01-06245f1392a1", "name": "idb-datasets", "title": "IDB Datasets", "type": "organization", "description": "Official list of IDB Datasets", "image_url": "", "created": "2025-03-08T06:03:00.229362", "is_organization": true, "approval_status": "approved", "state": "active"}, "owner_org": "aa9ea49a-64f0-4dcc-9c01-06245f1392a1", "private": false, "regional": [{"uri": "https://taxonomy.iadb.org/knowledgeProductsTaxonomy/43917453886588535763041", "labels": {"en": "Latin America and the Caribbean", "es": "Am\u00e9rica Latina y el Caribe", "fr": "Am\u00e9rique Latine et Cara\u00efbes", "pt_BR": "Am\u00e9rica Latina e Caribe"}}], "source": ["https://publications.iadb.org/en/serving-citizens-decade-civil-service-reforms-latin-america-2004-13"], "statistical_type": [{"uri": "https://taxonomy.iadb.org/knowledgeProductsTaxonomy/c8198b46-0399-40ec-877a-c2a5a26b0e8e", "labels": {"en": "Panel Data", "es": "Datos del Panel", "fr": "Donn\u00e9e de Panel", "pt_BR": "Dados em Painel"}}], "temporal_end": "2017-01-01", "temporal_start": "2004-01-01", "theme": [{"uri": "https://taxonomy.iadb.org/knowledgeProductsTaxonomy/53786709020451812", "labels": {"en": "Public Sector"}}], "title": {"en": "Civil Service Development Index: 2004-2013", "es": "\u00cdndice de Desarrollo del Servicio Civil: 2004-2013", "fr": "Indice de D\u00e9veloppement de la Fonction Publique : 2004-2013", "pt_BR": "\u00cdndice de Desenvolvimento do Servi\u00e7o Civil: 2004-2013"}, "type": "dataset", "unit_observation": {}, "unit_responsible": {"en": "Innovation in Citizen Services Division (VPS/IFD/ICS)"}, "version": null, "creator": [{"creator_name": {"en": "Cort\u00e1zar Velarde, Juan Carlos"}, "creator_type": "organizational", "url": ""}, {"creator_name": {"en": "Lafuente, Mariano"}, "creator_type": "organizational", "url": ""}, {"creator_name": {"en": "Sangin\u00e9s, Mario"}, "creator_type": "organizational", "url": ""}, {"creator_name": {"en": "Inter-American Development Bank"}, "creator_type": "organizational", "url": ""}], "publisher": [{"publisher_name": {"en": "Inter-American Development Bank"}, "uri": "https://data.iadb.org"}], "resources": [{"access_rights": "", "access_url": "https://data.iadb.org/dataset/c4c320d8-63c4-4b6f-a68b-cc462d1edda0/resource/d864f862-d643-4e46-8e19-67869448202a", "cache_last_updated": null, "cache_url": null, "ckan_url": "https://data.iadb.org", "created": "2025-03-08T13:35:28.308390", "data_notes": {}, "datastore_active": true, "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": true, "description": "", "file_id": "9587ca79-2568-4551-b02d-95657d8482ad", "format": "CSV", "hash": "b53c47816457fc6ab10d611964da1fc6", "id": "d864f862-d643-4e46-8e19-67869448202a", "ignore_hash": false, "indicator_category": "", "is_indicator": false, "language": [], "last_modified": "2025-03-08T13:35:28.251461", "metadata_modified": "2025-12-24T01:03:09.667429", "mimetype": "text/csv", "mimetype_inner": null, "name": "civil_service_development_index", "package_id": "c4c320d8-63c4-4b6f-a68b-cc462d1edda0", "position": 0, "resource_id": "d864f862-d643-4e46-8e19-67869448202a", "resource_type": null, "rights": {}, "set_url_type": false, "size": 31437, "state": "active", "task_created": "2025-03-08 13:35:30.139881", "theme": {}, "url": "https://data.iadb.org/file/download/9587ca79-2568-4551-b02d-95657d8482ad"}], "spatial_coverage": [{"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Bahamas", "es": "Bahamas", "fr": "Bahamas", "pt_BR": "Bahamas"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3572887"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Barbados", "es": "Barbados", "fr": "Barbados", "pt_BR": "Barbados"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3374084"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Bolivia", "es": "Bolivia", "fr": "Bolivia", "pt_BR": "Bolivia"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3923057"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Brazil", "es": "Brazil", "fr": "Brazil", "pt_BR": "Brazil"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3469034"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Chile", "es": "Chile", "fr": "Chile", "pt_BR": "Chile"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3895114"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Colombia", "es": "Colombia", "fr": "Colombia", "pt_BR": "Colombia"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3686110"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Costa Rica", "es": "Costa Rica", "fr": "Costa Rica", "pt_BR": "Costa Rica"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3624060"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Dominican Republic", "es": "Dominican Republic", "fr": "Dominican Republic", "pt_BR": "Dominican Republic"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3508796"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Ecuador", "es": "Ecuador", "fr": "Ecuador", "pt_BR": "Ecuador"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3658394"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "El Salvador", "es": "El Salvador", "fr": "El Salvador", "pt_BR": "El Salvador"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3585968"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Guatemala", "es": "Guatemala", "fr": "Guatemala", "pt_BR": "Guatemala"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3595528"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Guyana", "es": "Guyana", "fr": "Guyana", "pt_BR": "Guyana"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3378535"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Haiti", "es": "Haiti", "fr": "Haiti", "pt_BR": "Haiti"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3723988"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Honduras", "es": "Honduras", "fr": "Honduras", "pt_BR": "Honduras"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3608932"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Jamaica", "es": "Jamaica", "fr": "Jamaica", "pt_BR": "Jamaica"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3489940"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Mexico", "es": "Mexico", "fr": "Mexico", "pt_BR": "Mexico"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3996063"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Nicaragua", "es": "Nicaragua", "fr": "Nicaragua", "pt_BR": "Nicaragua"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3617476"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Panama", "es": "Panama", "fr": "Panama", "pt_BR": "Panama"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3703430"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Paraguay", "es": "Paraguay", "fr": "Paraguay", "pt_BR": "Paraguay"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3437598"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Peru", "es": "Peru", "fr": "Peru", "pt_BR": "Peru"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3932488"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Suriname", "es": "Suriname", "fr": "Suriname", "pt_BR": "Suriname"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3382998"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Trinidad and Tobago", "es": "Trinidad and Tobago", "fr": "Trinidad and Tobago", "pt_BR": "Trinidad and Tobago"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3573591"}, {"bbox": "", "centroid": "", "geom": "", "label": {"en": "Uruguay", "es": "Uruguay", "fr": "Uruguay", "pt_BR": "Uruguay"}, "uri": "https://sws.geonames.org/3439705"}], "groups": [], "relationships_as_subject": [], "relationships_as_object": [], "doi": "10.60966/im02hm06", "doi_status": true, "domain": "https://data.iadb.org", "doi_date_published": "2025-03-09", "doi_publisher": "IADB", "data_collection_type": [{"uri": "https://taxonomy.iadb.org/knowledgeProductsTaxonomy/afaa6857-390d-423a-820a-e25d836282d5", "labels": {"en": "Administrative Data", "es": "Datos Administrativos", "fr": "Donn\u00e9es administratives", "pt_BR": "Dados Administrativos"}}], "keyword": {"en": ["Civil Service"], "es": ["Servicio civil"], "fr": ["Fonction publique"], "pt_BR": ["Servi\u00e7o civil"]}, "contact_point": "opendata@iadb.org", "description": {"en": "Results of the Civil Service Development Index (CSDI), obtained from diagnostics of the institutional quality of civil service systems in 16 Latin American countries. The IDB supported the design of a methodology that evaluates critical points to assess the civil services and carried out country evaluations in 2004. Between 2011 and 2013, a second group of diagnostics second group of diagnostics were completed (with the support of the Inter-American Development Bank, and in the case of Central American countries and Dominican Republic with the support of the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation and Development \u2013AECID- and the Central American Integration System-SICA). Scores are available for 2004, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2017 and 2019 (year of second and/or third measurement varies per country). In 2015, 2017 and 2019, the IDB completed the third series of diagnosis. During the first assessment, 93 critical points were identified; each of those fed a subsystem and an index. In 2010 the methodology was simplified to 33 critical points and the base line was recalibrated to ensure comparability. The methodology is based in the identification of critical points that feed 8 subsystems: 1. Human Resources Planning, 2. Work Organization, 3. Employment management, 4. Performance management, 5. Compensation management, 6. Development management, 7. Human and social relations management, 8. HR Function organization; and 5 indexes: 1. Efficiency, 2. Merit, 3. Structural consistency, 4. Functional capacity, and 5. Integrating capacity.", "es": "Resultados del \u00cdndice de Desarrollo del Servicio Civil (IDSC), obtenidos a partir de diagn\u00f3sticos sobre la calidad institucional de los sistemas de servicio civil en 16 pa\u00edses de Am\u00e9rica Latina. El Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID) apoy\u00f3 el dise\u00f1o de una metodolog\u00eda que eval\u00faa puntos cr\u00edticos para valorar los servicios civiles y realiz\u00f3 evaluaciones pa\u00eds en 2004. Entre 2011 y 2013 se complet\u00f3 un segundo grupo de diagn\u00f3sticos (con el apoyo del BID y, en el caso de los pa\u00edses de Centroam\u00e9rica y la Rep\u00fablica Dominicana, con el apoyo de la Agencia Espa\u00f1ola de Cooperaci\u00f3n Internacional para el Desarrollo \u2014AECID\u2014 y del Sistema de la Integraci\u00f3n Centroamericana \u2014SICA\u2014). Hay puntajes disponibles para 2004, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2017 y 2019 (el a\u00f1o de la segunda y/o tercera medici\u00f3n var\u00eda seg\u00fan el pa\u00eds). En 2015, 2017 y 2019, el BID complet\u00f3 la tercera serie de diagn\u00f3sticos. Durante la primera evaluaci\u00f3n se identificaron 93 puntos cr\u00edticos; cada uno aliment\u00f3 un subsistema y un \u00edndice. En 2010, la metodolog\u00eda se simplific\u00f3 a 33 puntos cr\u00edticos y se recalibr\u00f3 la l\u00ednea de base para asegurar la comparabilidad. La metodolog\u00eda se basa en la identificaci\u00f3n de puntos cr\u00edticos que alimentan 8 subsistemas: 1) Planificaci\u00f3n de recursos humanos, 2) Organizaci\u00f3n del trabajo, 3) Gesti\u00f3n del empleo, 4) Gesti\u00f3n del desempe\u00f1o, 5) Gesti\u00f3n de compensaciones, 6) Gesti\u00f3n del desarrollo, 7) Gesti\u00f3n de relaciones humanas y sociales, 8) Organizaci\u00f3n de la funci\u00f3n de recursos humanos; y 5 \u00edndices: 1) Eficiencia, 2) M\u00e9rito, 3) Consistencia estructural, 4) Capacidad funcional y 5) Capacidad integradora.", "fr": "R\u00e9sultats de l\u2019Indice de d\u00e9veloppement de la fonction publique (CSDI), obtenus \u00e0 partir de diagnostics de la qualit\u00e9 institutionnelle des syst\u00e8mes de fonction publique dans 16 pays d\u2019Am\u00e9rique latine. La Banque interam\u00e9ricaine de d\u00e9veloppement (BID) a soutenu l\u2019\u00e9laboration d\u2019une m\u00e9thodologie \u00e9valuant des points critiques afin d\u2019appr\u00e9cier les services civils, et a men\u00e9 des \u00e9valuations par pays en 2004. Entre 2011 et 2013, un deuxi\u00e8me groupe de diagnostics a \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9alis\u00e9 (avec l\u2019appui de la Banque interam\u00e9ricaine de d\u00e9veloppement et, dans le cas des pays d\u2019Am\u00e9rique centrale et de la R\u00e9publique dominicaine, avec l\u2019appui de l\u2019Agence espagnole de coop\u00e9ration internationale pour le d\u00e9veloppement \u2013 AECID \u2013 et du Syst\u00e8me d\u2019int\u00e9gration centram\u00e9ricain \u2013 SICA). Des r\u00e9sultats sont disponibles pour 2004, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2017 et 2019 (l\u2019ann\u00e9e de la deuxi\u00e8me et/ou de la troisi\u00e8me mesure varie selon le pays). En 2015, 2017 et 2019, la BID a achev\u00e9 la troisi\u00e8me s\u00e9rie de diagnostics. Lors de la premi\u00e8re \u00e9valuation, 93 points critiques ont \u00e9t\u00e9 identifi\u00e9s ; chacun alimentait un sous-syst\u00e8me et un indice. En 2010, la m\u00e9thodologie a \u00e9t\u00e9 simplifi\u00e9e \u00e0 33 points critiques et la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence de base a \u00e9t\u00e9 recalibr\u00e9e afin d\u2019assurer la comparabilit\u00e9. La m\u00e9thodologie repose sur l\u2019identification de points critiques alimentant 8 sous-syst\u00e8mes : 1) Planification des ressources humaines, 2) Organisation du travail, 3) Gestion de l\u2019emploi, 4) Gestion de la performance, 5) Gestion des r\u00e9mun\u00e9rations, 6) Gestion du d\u00e9veloppement, 7) Gestion des relations humaines et sociales, 8) Organisation de la fonction RH ; et 5 indices : 1) Efficience, 2) M\u00e9rite, 3) Coh\u00e9rence structurelle, 4) Capacit\u00e9 fonctionnelle, 5) Capacit\u00e9 d\u2019int\u00e9gration.", "pt_BR": "Resultados do \u00cdndice de Desenvolvimento do Servi\u00e7o Civil (CSDI), obtidos a partir de diagn\u00f3sticos da qualidade institucional dos sistemas de servi\u00e7o civil em 16 pa\u00edses da Am\u00e9rica Latina. O BID apoiou a elabora\u00e7\u00e3o de uma metodologia que avalia pontos cr\u00edticos para examinar os servi\u00e7os civis e realizou avalia\u00e7\u00f5es por pa\u00eds em 2004. Entre 2011 e 2013, foi conclu\u00eddo um segundo grupo de diagn\u00f3sticos (com o apoio do Banco Interamericano de Desenvolvimento e, no caso dos pa\u00edses da Am\u00e9rica Central e da Rep\u00fablica Dominicana, com o apoio da Ag\u00eancia Espanhola de Coopera\u00e7\u00e3o Internacional para o Desenvolvimento \u2013 AECID \u2013 e do Sistema de Integra\u00e7\u00e3o Centro-Americana \u2013 SICA). As pontua\u00e7\u00f5es est\u00e3o dispon\u00edveis para 2004, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2017 e 2019 (o ano da segunda e/ou terceira medi\u00e7\u00e3o varia conforme o pa\u00eds). Em 2015, 2017 e 2019, o BID concluiu a terceira s\u00e9rie de diagn\u00f3sticos. Durante a primeira avalia\u00e7\u00e3o, foram identificados 93 pontos cr\u00edticos; cada um deles alimentou um subsistema e um \u00edndice. Em 2010, a metodologia foi simplificada para 33 pontos cr\u00edticos e a linha de base foi recalibrada para assegurar a comparabilidade. A metodologia baseia-se na identifica\u00e7\u00e3o de pontos cr\u00edticos que alimentam 8 subsistemas: 1. Planejamento de Recursos Humanos, 2. Organiza\u00e7\u00e3o do Trabalho, 3. Gest\u00e3o do Emprego, 4. Gest\u00e3o do Desempenho, 5. Gest\u00e3o da Remunera\u00e7\u00e3o, 6. Gest\u00e3o do Desenvolvimento, 7. Gest\u00e3o das Rela\u00e7\u00f5es Humanas e Sociais, 8. Organiza\u00e7\u00e3o da Fun\u00e7\u00e3o de RH; e 5 \u00edndices: 1. Efici\u00eancia, 2. M\u00e9rito, 3. Consist\u00eancia Estrutural, 4. Capacidade Funcional e 5. Capacidade Integradora."}}}